The first is the quote that says: "I don’t think any motor-vehicle operator wants to run over a cyclist" That is not true at all. I have met motorists who have bluntly stated they do want to run over a cyclist and will do so to the next cyclist they see. There have been 27 bicycle fatalities in the last 4 years in Iowa. I wonder if the motorists who issued the threat about running over a cyclist are contributors to the 27 cyclist deaths?
Another thing I disagree with is the statement about putting people in harms way. As a cyclist I can say for certain I have no illusions what can happen when riding. I never feel any traffic law, code or ordinance will physically protect me from harm nor do I feel that it puts me in harms way. Most traffic laws are reactive vs proactive as this proposed change is. Reactive in the way that when the law is violated the violator is held more accountable with a more severe punishment, whether it is a higher fine or prison time.
I think any of the law makers who oppose this need to get their asses on a bicycle and ride at least 100 miles in the state of Iowa. 50 within a city and 50 on a county and state hwy. This way they will see how important this proposed law is and why it is needed.
The bottom line and fact is this needs to pass and pass this year at this Legislative Session. It can no longer wait.
DES MOINES – Bicycle enthusiasts have shifted gears and revamped legislation intended to improve safety for riders and others on Iowa roadways in hopes of getting a measure to Gov. Chet Culver’s desk this session.
A House subcommittee has begun work on a proposal that would expand state law governing vehicle passing rules to include overtaking a bicycle by requiring a motorist to pass a bicycle on the left while staying at least 3 feet from the bicycle.
The provision also requires the overtaking vehicle to maintain a safe distance away from another vehicle or bike before returning to the right lane of a highway, while the overtaken vehicle is prohibited from speeding up to prevent the passing vehicle from moving back into the right lane.
The proposed House language also provides protections for a “vulnerable user” of a roadway, crosswalk or shoulder that would apply to a pedestrian, person riding an animal, the operator of a tractor or machine that doesn’t have an enclosed cab, a skateboarder, a rollerblader/rollerskater, highway worker, a person riding an electric scooter or bicyclist.
The new protection applies whether the vulnerable user is using the highway in accordance with the new code chapter or not, although the person could be fined or cited for violating a separate law that might apply.
The proposed House language states a vehicle operator cannot drive carelessly or unnecessarily close to a vulnerable user or knowingly throw or project an object or substance at the user. The legislation includes scheduled fines for violations and adds enhanced fines and driver’s license suspension in situations where a violation causes serious injury or death.
“It’s a start, it’s a good start, I think,” said Rep. Sharon Steckman, D-Mason City. “With the deaths that we’ve had this year and years before in Iowa, I think we need to do something. There’s a consequence.”
The proposed changes were made after Senate File 117, a so-called bill of rights for bicyclists, passed the Senate last year but stalled in the House. Steckman said she was hopeful the new approach could get the bill moving in the legislative process.
Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, a key Senate backer, said he believed the House changes improve the bill but he preferred the Senate language that requires a separation distance of 5 feet for vehicles passing or following a bicyclist.
“Three feet is not a very big passing zone at 60 mph. We’ve had 27 (bicycle) fatalities over last four years. I think a greater level of protection might be warranted,” Bolkcom said. “I think we would want to continue to negotiate. We’ll have to see what comes over and what people want to do.”
Rep. Clel Baudler, R-Greenfield, a member of the House Human Resources subcommittee considering the changes to S.F. 117, said the bill “has a lot of problems,” including the fact it is not being considered by either House transportation or public safety panels.
Baudler said he would support a requirement that bicyclists wear bright orange or yellow apparel, such as deer or small-game hunters in Iowa do so they could be better seen and identified by vehicle operators in judging their speed. He also said he had a problem protecting people who are breaking Iowa laws, such as electric scooter operators or others listed as vulnerable users who should not be on highways or shoulders.
Rep. Brian Quirk, D-New Hampton, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, said he would give the bill a “50-50 shot” at House passage, noting it does not address safety concerns he has and may create a false sense of security for bicyclists when dealing with a multi-ton truck that can’t “stop on a dime.”
“It’s going to put people in harm’s way,” he said. “The law of physics tends to take over.”
Sen. Bill Dotzler, D-Waterloo, said he appreciated House members willingness to work on the issue and he was hopeful the issue could move forward this session.
“Our main goal is to make it a safer place out there on the roads,” he said. “I don’t think any motor-vehicle operator wants to run over a cyclist and certainly cyclists don’t to get run over. So we’ve got common ground right from the start and I’m hopeful that we can work something out.”
Link: Bike advocates shift gears on safety legislation
Posts
